IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/12030.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The reluctant Central Bankers

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Moen

    (University of Mississippi)

  • Ellis Tallman

    (Oberlin College USA)

Abstract

"The big New York banks were in a position to serve as a private lender of last resort for the United States during the National Banking Era. As a lender of last resort the big New York banks could aid illiquid banks by increasing the volume of reserves available to the banking system. But that they had the incentives to behave so is less clear, for the interests of these private bankers were not necessarily aligned with the collective banking interests in New York, much less in the rest of the nation for that matter. The historical record reveals that the large New York banks indeed behaved in ways that approached those of a central bank, as in the Panics of 1873, 1884, and 1890. On other occasions, however, they missed the mark. Intermediaries that were not members of the Clearing House were not likely to be aided in a timely way, nor were banks far removed from New York City likely candidates for assistance, as in 1893. The Panic of 1907 seems to be an instance in which the Big Six hesitatingly provided central bank services to a constituency broader than the Clearing House banks only after the dangers to the big banks had become clear. In general, the New York banks still had to put their own, private reserves at risk during a panic, making them reluctant to help non-Clearing House interests unless their own interest was also threatened."

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Moen & Ellis Tallman, 2012. "The reluctant Central Bankers," Working Papers 12030, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:12030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/588ddfe3-a902-4d29-aa80-c8963a651f9c.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:12030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.