IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/105699.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Climate economics support for the UN climate targets

Author

Listed:
  • Hansel, Martin C.
  • Drupp, Moritz A.
  • Johansson, Daniel A. J.
  • Nesje, Frikk
  • Azar, Christian
  • Freeman, Mark. C.
  • Groom, Ben
  • Sterner, Thomas

Abstract

Under the UN Paris Agreement, countries committed to limiting global warming to well below 2 °C and to actively pursue a 1.5 °C limit. Yet, according to the 2018 Economics Nobel laureate William Nordhaus, these targets are economically suboptimal or unattainable and the world community should aim for 3.5 °C in 2100 instead. Here, we show that the UN climate targets may be optimal even in the Dynamic Integrated Climate–Economy (DICE) integrated assessment model, when appropriately updated. Changes to DICE include more accurate calibration of the carbon cycle and energy balance model, and updated climate damage estimates. To determine economically ‘optimal’ climate policy paths, we use the range of expert views on the ethics of intergenerational welfare. When updates from climate science and economics are considered jointly, we find that around three-quarters (or one-third) of expert views on intergenerational welfare translate into economically optimal climate policy paths that are consistent with the 2 °C (or 1.5 °C) target.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansel, Martin C. & Drupp, Moritz A. & Johansson, Daniel A. J. & Nesje, Frikk & Azar, Christian & Freeman, Mark. C. & Groom, Ben & Sterner, Thomas, 2020. "Climate economics support for the UN climate targets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105699, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:105699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/105699/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    climate science; economics; intergenerational welfare; policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:105699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.