This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Expected Versus Realized Income Expectations: A Test of the Rational Expectations Hypothesis

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Marcel Das (Tilburg University)
Arthur van Soest (Tilburg University)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We analyze answers to household survey questions on whether the respondents' household income has changed in the past twelve months, and on whether the respondents expect their household income to change in the next twelve months. Both questions are answered on a discrete five points scale. The data are an unbalanced panel of ten consecutive annual waves.
Using cross-tabulations of expected and realized changes, we first test the "best-case" hypothesis. This hypothesis implies, under two different nonparametric assumptions on how respondents form their predictions, that respondents have rational expectations, that there are no common unexpected shocks, and that reported expectations are best predictions of future outcomes. We find that the best case hypothesis is rejected: for all years, too many respondents who predict an income fall, ex post report that their household income has not changed.
We then construct a bivariate ordered probit random effects panel data model, in which we explain both expectations and realizations from background variables such as age, education level, and labour market status, and from the one year lagged expectation and realization. We show that the hypothesis of rational expectations implies certain restrictions on the parameters in the two equations of this model. The model is estimated by simulated maximum likelihood using the Geweke-Hajivassilou-Keane (GHK) method. The hypothesis of rational expectations is rejected. The hypotheses that expectations are adaptive or naive can be tested in a similar way, and are also rejected.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/es2000/1750.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers with number 1750.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 01 Aug 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1750

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Todd R. Stinebrickner & Ralph Stinebrickner, 2009. "Learning about Academic Ability and the College Drop-out Decision," NBER Working Papers 14810, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All full texts are decentralized with the publishers, none reside on this server, thus making it possible to offer this service for free to all parties.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.