IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/wc2000/1448.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bounds on the Risk-Free Interest Rate in Incomplete Markets With and Without Utility Functions Exhibiting Constant Absolute Risk Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Chiaki Hara

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

In a model of a two-period exchange economy under uncertainty, we find an upper bound for the equilibrium risk-free interest rate when the expected aggregate endowment in the second period is no greater than the first-period aggregate endowment. We also find a lower bound when the agents' utility functions exhibit constant absolute risk aversion and the expected aggregate endowment in the second period is no smaller than the first-period counterpart. These bounds are independent of the degree of market incompleteness, and so these results show to what extent market incompleteness can explain the risk-free rate puzzle in this class of general equilibrium models with heterogeneous agents. A general method of finding lower bounds is also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiaki Hara, 2000. "Bounds on the Risk-Free Interest Rate in Incomplete Markets With and Without Utility Functions Exhibiting Constant Absolute Risk Aversion," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1448, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/es2000/1448.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David K. Levine & William R. Zame, 2002. "Does Market Incompleteness Matter?," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1805-1839, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.