IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/nasm04/558.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Identifying Information Asymmetries: New Methods and Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Dean Karlan
  • Jonathan Zinman

Abstract

This paper estimates the prevalence of asymmetric information in a consumer credit market using a field experiment of our design. A major South African lender issued 60,000 direct mail offers where the interest rate was randomized along two different dimensions — an initial “offer rate†on the direct mail solicitation, and a weakly lesser “contract rate†the applicant received after responding to the solicitation and agreeing to the initial offer rate. These two dimensions of random variation in interest rates, combined with the large sample (including 6,200 accepted offers) and complete knowledge of the Lender’s information set, will enable us to identify the prevalence and impacts of specific types of private information. Specifically, our setup distinguishes adverse selection from moral hazard/repayment burden effects on repayment and profitability, and thereby generates unique empirical evidence on the sources and importance (or lack thereof) of asymmetric information.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean Karlan & Jonathan Zinman, 2004. "Identifying Information Asymmetries: New Methods and Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 558, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/esNASM04/up.493.1075596012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    adverse selection; moral hazard; field experiment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.