Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Organizational Learning: An Experimental Study

Contents:

Author Info

  • April Franco
  • Andreas Blume
  • John Duffy

Abstract

In this paper we experimentally investigate decentralized, organizational learning. The main objective is to understand how learning members of an organization cope with the confounding effects of the simultaneous learning of others. We use versions of a simple "success-or-failure" game due to Blume and Franco [2003] as our stylized model of organizational learning. In this game, each player has two action choices and is unable to communicate or observe the action choice of their partner. Only one choice of actions by a pair results in a "success" (high payoff); all other action combinations lead to failure (zero payoff). The success or failure game is repeated for two rounds, but ends early if a success is achieved. Decentralization is captured by explicit constraints on players' strategies, for instance, players are unable to condition their action choices on the past actions of the other member of the organization. This game theoretic formalization of organizational learning together with the assumption of fully rational agents are novel features of this study. They allow for crisp predictions with regard to the frequency with which organizational members who have not achieved a success should switch their action choices as a function of parameters governing individual preferences, such as the rate of time preference, which serves as one treatment variable. As a second treatment, we compare the two-player organizational learning model with a baseline, one-player individual decision-making problem involving a choice that is analogous to the organizational learning model. Preliminary experimental evidence suggests that in the two-player organizational model, players do account for the confounding effects of the learning of others by switching actions less frequently than in the one-period, individual decision making experiment in line with the predictions of the theory. We are currently exploring, experimentally, the predictions in the case where the size of the organization is increases from 2 to 3 and the number of success outcomes remains fixed at 1

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings with number 498.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:498

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: learning; organizational behavior; experimental economics;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Sourav Bhattacharya & John Duffy & Sun-Tak Kim, 2011. "Compulsory and Voluntary Voting Mechanisms: An Experimental Study," Working Papers 456, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Economics, revised Mar 2013.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.