The Impact of Measurement Error on Evaluation Methods Based on Strong Ignorability
AbstractWhen selection bias can purely be attributed to observables, several estimators have been discussed in the literature to estimate the average effect of a binary treatment or policy on a scalar outcome. Identification typically exploits the unconfoundedness of the treatment, which is verified if the participation status is independent of potential outcomes conditional on observable covariates. Assuming unconfoundedness, the average effect of the treatment can be estimated by matching, differencing within subpopulation averages of treated and untreated units, or by propensity score methods under an additional condition on the support of the covariates exploited. The latter condition, together with unconfoundedness, makes participation into the treatment group strongly ignorable, as defined by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983). This paper derives conditions for identification and estimation of treatment effects when observable covariates relevant to unconfoundedness are measured with error. An expression for the measurement error bias is derived, and conditions are discussed for this to be zero. A bias correction procedure is also presented, which uses non-parametric estimates of functionals of the distribution of observed covariates.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings with number 339.
Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC
potential outcomes; small sigma asymptotics; treatment effects;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
- C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Wickens, Michael R, 1972. "A Note on the Use of Proxy Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(4), pages 759-61, July.
- Michael LECHNER, 2008. "A Note on the Common Support Problem in Applied Evaluation Studies," Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, ENSAE, issue 91-92, pages 217-235.
- Jinyong Hahn, 1998. "On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 315-332, March.
- James Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Jeffrey Smith & Petra Todd, 1998.
"Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data,"
NBER Working Papers
6699, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- James Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Jeffrey Smith & Petra Todd, 1998. "Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(5), pages 1017-1098, September.
- Keisuke Hirano & Guido W. Imbens & Geert Ridder, 2003.
"Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score,"
Econometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1161-1189, 07.
- Keisuke Hirano & Guido W. Imbens & Geert Ridder, 2000. "Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score," NBER Technical Working Papers 0251, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Guido Imbens, 2000. "Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1166, Econometric Society.
- Andrew Chesher & Christian Schluter, 2002.
"Welfare Measurement and Measurement Error,"
Review of Economic Studies,
Oxford University Press, vol. 69(2), pages 357-378.
- Heckman, James J. & Lalonde, Robert J. & Smith, Jeffrey A., 1999. "The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 31, pages 1865-2097 Elsevier.
- Klein, Tobias J., 2007.
"Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Instrumental Variables without Monotonicity?,"
IZA Discussion Papers
2738, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Klein, Tobias J., 2010. "Heterogeneous treatment effects: Instrumental variables without monotonicity?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 99-116, April.
- Klein, T.J., 2008. "Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Instrumental Variables Without Monotonicity?," Discussion Paper 2008-45, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Siedler, Thomas, 2006.
"Family and Politics: Does Parental Unemployment Cause Right-Wing Extremism?,"
IZA Discussion Papers
2411, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Siedler, Thomas, 2006. "Family and politics: does parental unemployment cause right-wing extremism?," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-51, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
- Thomas Siedler, 2007. "Does Parental Unemployment Cause Right-Wing Extremism?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 666, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.