This paper examines the determinants of inflation forecast uncertainty using a panel of density forecasts from the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF). We show that previous studies based on aggregate data are biased due to heterogeneity of individual forecasts. Instead, we estimate a dynamic heterogeneous panel data model. We find that, although past forecast uncertainty is important, it is not as important as previously thought. In addition, the strong link between past squared forecast errors and the current forecast uncertainty, as often is found in the GARCH literature, is largely lost in the multi-period context with varying forecast horizons. Forecasters are found to pay more attention to recent “news†about inflation than the out-dated past squared forecast errors. We propose a novel way to estimating uncertainty of “news†using Kullback-Leibler Information, and show that it is an important determinant of the current inflation forecast uncertainty. Our results also support Friedman (1977)’s conjecture that higher inflation rate leads to higher inflation uncertainty
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: E31 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation E37 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Forecasting and Simulation C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: