Doctor Keynes: Economic Theory in a Diagnostic Science
AbstractIn his own view, economic theory was important to Keynes's work as an economists. Aside from the General Theory, most of his economic writings, however policy oriented make explicit reference to theory. Nevertheless, Keynes's theoretical style is so far from what contemporary economics regards as "theory" that some have dismissed Keynes as a theorist altogether or thought of him as a theorist hampered by the lack of modern mathematical tools. In this paper, I argue to the contrary that Keynes's theoretical style is conditioned by a conception of theory as a diagnostic tool. This is a natural development from Marshall, and conceptually very different from modern macroeconomists. It is nonetheless a very attractive conception of the place of theory in economics.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of California at Davis, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 06-3.
Date of creation: Apr 2005
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616-8578
Phone: (530) 752-0741
Fax: (530) 752-9382
Web page: http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/working_search.cfm
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michel, DE VROEY, 2004.
"The History of Macroeconomics Viewed Against the Background of the Marshall-Walras Divide,"
Discussion Papers (IRES - Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales)
2004017, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
- Michel De Vroey, 2004. "The History of Macroeconomics Viewed against the Background of the Marshall-Walras Divide," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 57-91, Supplemen.
- Hoover, Kevin D., 2004.
"Milton Friedman's Stance: The Methodology of Causal Realism,"
06-6, University of California at Davis, Department of Economics.
- Kevin Hoover, 2004. "Milton Friedman’s Stance: The Methodology of Causal Realism," Working Papers 66, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
- Hicks, J. R., 1975. "Value and Capital: An Inquiry into some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780198282693.
- Hoover, Kevin D., 2004. "Lost Causes," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(02), pages 149-164, June.
- Roger E. Backhouse & Jeff Biddle, 2000. "The Concept of Applied Economics: A History of Ambiguity and Multiple Meanings," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 1-24, Supplemen.
- Bradley W. Bateman, 1990. "Keynes, Induction, and Econometrics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 359-379, Summer.
- Anna M. Carabelli & Mario A. Cedrini, 2011. " Chapter 18 of the General Theory “Further Analysed”: The Theory of Economics as A Method," Working Papers 128, SEMEQ Department - Faculty of Economics - University of Eastern Piedmont.
- Michel, DE VROEY, 2007. "Marshallian and Walrasian Theory, Complementary or Alternative Approaches ? The Views in Presence," Discussion Papers (ECON - DÃ©partement des Sciences Economiques) 2007002, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.