For a Markov decision problem in which unknown transition probabilities serve as hidden state variables, we study the quality of two approximations to the decision rule of a Bayesian who each period updates his subjective distribution over the transition probabilities by Bayes' law. The first is the usual rational expectations approximation that assumes that the decision maker knows the transition probabilities. The second approximation is a version of Kreps' (1998) anticipated utility model in which decision makers update using Bayes' law but optimize in a way that is myopic with respect to their updating of probabilities. For a range of consumption smoothing examples, the anticipated utility approximation outperforms the rational expectations approximation. The anticipated utility and Bayesian models augment market prices of risk relative to the rational expectations approximation.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of California at Davis, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
05-23.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)