IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/corcae/01-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing in GMM Models without Truncation

Author

Listed:
  • Vogelsang, Timothy J.

    (Cornell U)

Abstract

This paper proposes a new approach to testing in the generalized method of moments (GMM) framework. The new tests are constructed using heteroskedasticity autocorrelation (HAC) robust standard errors computed using nonparametric spectral density estimators without truncation. While such standard errors are not consistent, a new asymptotic theory shows that they lead to valid tests nonetheless. In an over-identified linear instrumental variables model, simulations suggest that the new tests and the associated limiting distribution theory provide a more accurate first order asymptotic null approximation than standard HAC robust tests. Finite sample power of the new tests is shown to be comparable to standard tests. Because use of a truncation lag equal to the sample requires no additional choices for practitioners, the new approach could potentially lead to a standard of practice (which does not currently exist) for the computation of HAC robust standard errors in GMM models.

Suggested Citation

  • Vogelsang, Timothy J., 2001. "Testing in GMM Models without Truncation," Working Papers 01-12, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:corcae:01-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cae.economics.cornell.edu/gmm.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karim M. Abadir & Paolo Paruolo, 1997. "Two Mixed Normal Densities from Cointegration Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 671-680, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Wei-Ming & Kuan, Chung-Ming & Hsu, Yu-Chin, 2014. "Testing over-identifying restrictions without consistent estimation of the asymptotic covariance matrix," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 181-193.
    2. Shin‐Kun Peng & Takatoshi Tabuchi, 2007. "Spatial Competition in Variety and Number of Stores," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 227-250, March.
    3. Majid M. Al-Sadoon, 2014. "A general theory of rank testing," Economics Working Papers 1411, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Feb 2015.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karim Abadir, 1999. "An introduction to hypergeometric functions for economists," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 287-330.
    2. Thiago Revil T. Ferreira, 2018. "Stock Market Cross-Sectional Skewness and Business Cycle Fluctuations," International Finance Discussion Papers 1223, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Nicholas M. Kiefer & Timothy J. Vogelsang, 2002. "Heteroskedasticity-Autocorrelation Robust Standard Errors Using The Bartlett Kernel Without Truncation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(5), pages 2093-2095, September.
    4. Thiago Revil T. Ferreira, 2022. "Cross-Sectional Financial Conditions, Business Cycles and The Lending Channel," International Finance Discussion Papers 1335, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. Cubadda, Gianluca & Omtzigt, Pieter, 2005. "Small-sample improvements in the statistical analysis of seasonally cointegrated systems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 333-348, April.
    6. Abadir, Karim M. & Luati, Alessandra & Paruolo, Paolo, 2023. "GARCH density and functional forecasts," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 470-483.
    7. Sokbae Lee & Yuan Liao & Myung Hwan Seo & Youngki Shin, 2022. "Fast Inference for Quantile Regression with Tens of Millions of Observations," Papers 2209.14502, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:corcae:01-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.