This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Transparency, Liquidity and Price Formation

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Rindi, Barbara (Bocconi University, Italy)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper shows that the results on market transparency from previous literature are reversed when allowing for endogenous information acquisition: transparency reduces liquidity. Most theoretical models demonstrate that transparency enhances liquidity, whilst the results obtained so far by empirical and experimental works have been ambiguous. This paper shows how transparency a .ects the quality of financial markets. We model the market for a risky asset as an open limit-order book and compare three regimes of pre-trade transparency: under full transparency agents can observe the order flow and traders' personal identifiers.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Royal Economic Society in its series Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 with number 159.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 29 Aug 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2002:159

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/society/annualconf.asp
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Degryse, H.A. & Achter, M. van & Wuyts, G., 2007. "Dynamic Order Submission Strategies with Competition between a Dealer Market and a Crossing Network," Discussion Paper 2007-017, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Foucault, Thierry & Moinas, Sophie & Theissen, Erik, 2003. "Does Anonymity Matter in Electronic Limit Order Markets?," CEPR Discussion Papers 4091, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. PASCUAL, Roberto & VEREDAS, David, 2006. "Does the open limit order book matter in explaining long run volatility ?," CORE Discussion Papers 2006110, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
  4. Degryse, H.A., 2007. "Competition on Financial Markets: Does Market Design Matter?," Discussion Paper 2007-004, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Apart from a small start up grant in the 1990's, RePEc has received no funding and lives on the help of volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.