The Impact of the 1992 Cable Act on Consumer Demand and Welfare: A Discrete-Choice, Differentiated Products Approach
AbstractThe regulations implemented in accord with the 1992 Cable Act legislated that the per-channel cable prices fall by 10-17% from their September, 1992 levels. Upon implementation, however, while cable prices did show moderate declines, cable expenditures did not - in 1/3 of cable markets, the average consumer's cable bill actually increased. In addition, the services provided by some systems and the programming provided on those services also changed. This paper measures the benefit to consumers of the Cable Act in light of these changes in services, programming, and prices by cable systems. A Discrete-Choice Differentiated Product model of demand for cable television service forms the basis of the analysis. The individual utility model underlying this framework can accommodate the arbitrary bundling of program networks into services for sale to consumers by cable systems. It therefore provides a natural framework for measuring the impact of the Cable Act: whereas changes in the set of services offered by systems changes the set of choices facing consumers in those markets, changes in the programming across services changes the utility to each of those choices. Explicit aggregation over both individuals and choices permits estimation using available observations on a cross-section of cable markets from before and after the Cable Act. The results indicate that while households in the median market could have expected to receive welfare gains of $0.91 per month, they instead received welfare losses of $0.33 per month, equivalent to a 4.3% increase in the price of Basic Service. Given these results, the flexibility of the modeling framework is exploited to simulate the effects of an alternative regulatory mechanism, that of untying of Basic Service from all other cable services. In the median market, households would be indifferent between such a policy and maintaining the tie but reducing the price of Basic Service by 18.7%. This is coincidentally just slightly higher than the final price reductions mandated by the Act.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Duke University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 97-32.
Date of creation: 1997
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, Vol. 31, 2000, pages 422-449
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Department of Economics Duke University 213 Social Sciences Building Box 90097 Durham, NC 27708-0097
Phone: (919) 660-1800
Fax: (919) 684-8974
Web page: http://econ.duke.edu/
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- L96 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Telecommunications
- L50 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - General
- C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Department of Economics Webmaster).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.