Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The bias of the cpi: a critical discussion of the Boskin-report

Contents:

Author Info

  • C.K. Folkertsma
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This report provides a critical review of the Boskin-report and discusses possible implications for the cpi in the Netherlands. Moreover, two recent American suggestions to reduce the bias are discussed. The report concludes that although it is likely that the cpi overestimates the increase of the cost of living, the Boskin-commission provides insufficient empirical support for the quantification of the measurement error. Finally, the Boskin-commission made several suggestions to improve the cpi, but there are some unoesolved practical issues, which will hamper the implementation of some of the suggestions.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.dnb.nl/binaries/wo0505_tcm46-145855.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department in its series WO Research Memoranda (discontinued) with number 505.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Jun 1997
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:dnb:wormem:505

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Postbus 98, 1000 AB Amsterdam
    Web page: http://www.dnb.nl/en/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dnb:wormem:505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rob Vet).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.