This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Item Pricing Laws, Supplier Behavior, and the Diffusion of Time-Saving Technology Innovations Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics James G. Mulligan () (Department of Economics,University of Delaware)
Nilotpal Das
In this paper we provide non-parametric and parametric estimations of the initial diffusion process of point-of-sale optical scanners that illustrate the importance of controlling for supplier behavior and government regulations. In particular, we show that discrete changes in the early development of the technology followed predictably different diffusion paths depending on each vintage’s relative effect on service speed and costs of production. We also provide evidence that item-pricing laws passed in six states as consumer protection initiatives slowed down the initial diffusion of the technology at the same time as consumer acceptance of scanners was growing nation-wide.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by University of Delaware, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
06-11.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML ,
plain text ,
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
Length: 46 pages
Date of creation: 2006Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dlw:wpaper:06-11Contact details of provider: Postal: Purnell Hall, Newark, Delaware 19716 Fax: (302) 831-6968 Web page: http://www.lerner.udel.edu/economics/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Saul Hoffman).
Keywords: Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: O3 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change L8 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports :
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Francesco Caselli & Wilbur John Coleman II, 2001.
"Cross-Country Technology Diffusion: The Case of Computers ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 91(2), pages 328-335, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Jennifer F. Reinganum, 1983.
"Technology Adoption Under Imperfect Information ,"
Bell Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 14(1), pages 57-69, Spring.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Goolsbee, Austan & Klenow, Peter J, 2002.
"Evidence on Learning and Network Externalities in the Diffusion of Home Computers ,"
Journal of Law & Economics ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 317-43, October.
Other versions: Nancy L. Rose & Paul L. Joskow, 1990.
"The Diffusion of New Technologies: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry ,"
RAND Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 21(3), pages 354-373, Autumn.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Bronwyn H. Hall & Beethika Khan, 2003.
"Adoption of New Technology ,"
NBER Working Papers
9730, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Rosenberg, Nathan, 1972.
"Factors affecting the diffusion of technology ,"
Explorations in Economic History ,
Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 3-33.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Jennifer F. Reinganum, 1981.
"Market Structure and the Diffusion of New Technology ,"
Bell Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(2), pages 618-624, Autumn.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Geroski, P. A., 2000.
"Models of technology diffusion ,"
Research Policy ,
Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 603-625, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Levin, Sharon G & Levin, Stanford L & Meisel, John B, 1987.
"A Dynamic Analysis of the Adoption of a New Technology: The Case of Optical Scanners ,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics ,
MIT Press, vol. 69(1), pages 12-17, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Silvia Massini, 2004.
"The diffusion of mobile telephony in Italy and the UK: an empirical investigation ,"
Economics of Innovation and New Technology ,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 251-277, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Hannan, Timothy H & McDowell, John M, 1987.
"Rival Precedence and the Dynamics of Technology Adoption: An Empirical Analysis ,"
Economica ,
London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 54(214), pages 155-71, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Thomas, Louis A., 1999.
"Adoption order of new technologies in evolving markets ,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization ,
Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 453-482, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Liikanen, Jukka & Stoneman, Paul & Toivanen, Otto, 2004.
"Intergenerational effects in the diffusion of new technology: the case of mobile phones ,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization ,
Elsevier, vol. 22(8-9), pages 1137-1154, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Levy, Daniel, et al, 1997.
"The Magnitude of Menu Costs: Direct Evidence from Large U.S. Supermarket Chains ,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,
MIT Press, vol. 112(3), pages 791-825, August.
Other versions: Sarkar, Jayati, 1998.
" Technological Diffusion: Alternative Theories and Historical Evidence ,"
Journal of Economic Surveys ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 131-76, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Athey, Susan & Schmutzler, Armin, 2001.
"Investment and Market Dominance ,"
RAND Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 32(1), pages 1-26, Spring.
Georg Götz, 1999.
"Monopolistic Competition and the Diffusion of New Technology ,"
RAND Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 30(4), pages 679-693, Winter.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Mark Bergen & Daniel Levy & Sourav Ray & Paul Rubin & Benjamin Zeliger, 2004.
"When Little Things Mean a Lot: On the Inefficiency of Item Pricing Laws ,"
Law and Economics
0405005, EconWPA, revised 02 Jun 2005.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Mark Bergen & Daniel Levy & Sourav Ray & Paul Rubin & Benjamin Zeliger, 2004.
"When Little Things Mean a Lot: On the Inefficiency of Item Pricing Laws ,"
Emory Economics
0404, Department of Economics, Emory University (Atlanta).
[Downloadable!] Bergen, Mark & Levy, Daniel & Ray, Sourav & Rubin, Paul & Zeliger, Ben, 2006.
"When Little Things Mean a Lot: On the Inefficiency of Item Pricing Laws ,"
MPRA Paper
1158, University Library of Munich, Germany.
[Downloadable!] Massoud Karshenas & Paul L. Stoneman, 1993.
"Rank, Stock, Order, and Epidemic Effects in the Diffusion of New Process Technologies: An Empirical Model ,"
RAND Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 24(4), pages 503-528, Winter.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? IDEAS was launched in September 1997.
This page was last updated on 2008-7-9.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .