Measuring the Disutility of Imprisonment to Offenders
AbstractRecently, quite a lot of work has been done on deducing parameters from observed decisions using dynamic programming models, and Wolpin (1996) provides a good introduction to this literature. While a dynamic programming framework to this problem has not been utilised in this paper, the concept of bringing together actual decisions and a constructed model to explain these to infer an unobservable parameter is the same. For more discussion of the dynamic programming methodology and related issues, the reader is referred to Wolpin’s paper. Our alternative framework is to undertake a calibration exercise based on defendants’ optimal plea decisions for three different offences. For representative ex ante combinations of plausible parameter values for the cost of a guilty plea and expected cost of a trial we generate a very large sample of values of the discount rate at which a defendant would be indifferent between either plea. The median r value of our distributions is interpreted as the defendant’s willingness to pay to delay the cost or expected cost of imprisonment, and hence a measure of the disutility of imprisonment. Alternatively, our estimates can be interpreted as implicit premiums over and above the unskilled wage rate.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance in its series Economics Series with number 2008_09.
Length: 29 pages
Date of creation: 18 Oct 2008
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood 3125
Phone: 61 3 9244 3815
Web page: http://www.deakin.edu.au/buslaw/aef/index.php
Discount rates; Optimal plea decision;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- K0 - Law and Economics - - General
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Shane Frederick & George Loewenstein & Ted O'Donoghue, 2002. "Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 351-401, June.
- A. Mitchell Polinsky, 2004.
"The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment when Wealth is Unobservable,"
03-037, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
- Polinsky, A. Mitchell, 2006. "The optimal use of fines and imprisonment when wealth is unobservable," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(4-5), pages 823-835, May.
- A. Mitchell Polinsky, 2004. "The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment When Wealth is Unobservable," NBER Working Papers 10761, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dr Xueli Tang).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.