Although the importance of the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor (σ) has long been recognized in several branches of economics, it has received too little attention in the growth literature. This paper aims to partly rectify this omission by exploring the growth potentials with σ as a yardstick and studying how different values of σ impact upon the balanced growth paths in theoretical model. When σ is high, the incremental capital is easily substituted for labor, resulting in a nearly equiproportionate increase in both factors. Under constant returns to scale, diminishing returns sets-in very slowly, and the marginal and average products of capital can remain sufficiently large so that output can grow indefinitely. The theoretical model is built upon the work of de La Grandville and Solow (2004) who show that perpetual growth is possible in the Solow (1956) model even without technological progress, if value of σ exceeds a critical value that is greater than unity ( cH σ ). I extend the model to show that output level, capital stock and consumption follow perpetual decline if σ is less than another critical value ( cL σ ) that lies between zero and unity. The critical values depend on saving, population growth and depreciation rates, and the initial share of capital in total output; hence each country has at most one critical value. I show that the above results also carry into in a model of endogenous saving, and analytically prove that the balanced growth path exists only if σ lies between two critical values- cL σ and cH σ . I calibrate the critical value of σ from the data for each country. These values are then compared to σˆ ’s estimated from country time series data. A number of countries, mainly from Africa, have ˆ cL σ <σ COUNTRIES IS σ BRIGHT HAS SUFFICIENTLY CAPITA LOW. ALTHOUGH GROWTH INDICATING PER . NEGATIVE MANY HAVE AVERAGE VERY NONE LARGE OUTPUT THEM IN CH OF ˆ (I.E., EITHER OR THESE POTENTIAL,>σ ).
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance in its series Economics Series with number
2007_02.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Dr Xueli Tang).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: O40 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General O41 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Solow, Robert M., 1999.
"Neoclassical growth theory,"
Handbook of Macroeconomics,
in: J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 9, pages 637-667
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Solow, Robert M., 2005.
"Reflections on Growth Theory,"
Handbook of Economic Growth,
in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 3-10
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)