IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dkn/ecomet/fe_2012_04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparison of estimators of the Weibull Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Akram

    (Monash University)

  • Aziz Hayat

    (Deakin University)

Abstract

We compare the small sample performance (in terms of bias and root mean squared error) of L-moment estimator of 3-parameter Weibull distribution with Maximum likelihood Estimation (MLE), Moment Estimation (MoE), Least squared estimation (LSE), the Modified MLE (MMLE), Modified MoE (MMoE), and the Maximum Product of Spacing (MPS). Overall, the LM method has the tendency to perform well as it is almost always close to the best method of estimation. The ML performance is remarkable even in small sample of size n = 10 when the shape parameter β lies in [1.5, 4] range.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Akram & Aziz Hayat, 2012. "Comparison of estimators of the Weibull Distribution," Working Papers 2012_04, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:dkn:ecomet:fe_2012_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.deakin.edu.au/buslaw/aef/workingpapers/fin-econometrics/2012_04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dkn:ecomet:fe_2012_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Xueli Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedeaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.