IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwwpp/dp61.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Über Sinn und Unsinn von Repräsentativitätsstudien

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Rendtel
  • Ulrich Pötter

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Rendtel & Ulrich Pötter, 1992. "Über Sinn und Unsinn von Repräsentativitätsstudien," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 61, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.471179.de/dp61.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrich Rendtel, 1992. "On the Choice of a Selection-Model When Estimating Regressionmodels with Selectivity," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 53, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rainer Pischner, 1993. "Quer- und Längsschnittgewichtung des Sozio-ökonomischen Panels," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 69, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kossova, Elena & Potanin, Bogdan, 2018. "Heckman method and switching regression model multivariate generalization," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 50, pages 114-143.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.