Seriously Ceres ?
AbstractWithin maritime logistics the containerised trade market is growing rapidly with the uprising of the Far East. European container port competition among the ports in the Le Havre-Hamburg range is fierce as they are threatened by a shortage of terminal capacity. The port of Amsterdam identified this threat and realised a brand new container terminal, the Ceres Paragon Terminal, in 2002. Characterised by a revolutionary concept known as an indented berth, served simultaneously by nine ultra modern post-Panamax gantry cranes, productivity levels should raised to over 250 picks an hour. Although the odds seemed favourable for the new terminal, enthusiasm was replaced by vexation. Three years later the terminal has not yet served a single contract client since it became operable. And the future does not look bright. Their main Rotterdam based competitor, ECT, is planning a take-over that could make or break the future of the Ceres Paragon Terminal. The objective of this paper is to study if the failure of the container ambitions of Amsterdam can be traced back to main port choice criteria or port performance, identified in literature.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics in its series Serie Research Memoranda with number 0003.
Date of creation: 2005
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.feweb.vu.nl
Container; Terminal; Choice criteria; Performance; Competition; Amsterdam;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- R49 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Other
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2006-07-28 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Simme J Veldman & Ewout H B�ckmann, 2003. "A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports," Maritime Economics and Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 3-22, March.
- T C Lirn & H A Thanopoulou & M J Beynon & A K C Beresford, 2004. "An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective," Maritime Economics and Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 70-91, March.
- Dong-Wook Song & Ki-Tae Yeo, 2004. "A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Maritime Economics and Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 34-52, March.
- Arduino, Giulia & Aronietis, Raimonds & Crozet, Yves & Frouws, Koos & Ferrari, Claudio & Guihéry, Laurent & Kapros, Seraphim & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Laroche, Florent & Lambrou, Maria & Lloyd, Michael, 2013. "How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 97-107.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (R. Dam).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.