This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Hedging with stock index futures: downside risk versus the variance

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Nat, M. van der (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)
Brouwer, F.
Abstract

In this paper we investigate hedging a stock portfolio with stock index futures. Instead of defining the hedge ratio as the minimum variance hedge ratio, we consider several measures of downside risk: the semivariance according to Markowitz [ 19591 and the various lower partial moments according to Fishburn's [ 1977] alpha-t model (alpha>O). Analytically we show that for normal returns and biased futures markets there is an extra cost associated with hedging lower partial moments if the minimum variance hedge ratio instead of the optimal hedge ratio is used. We prove that the extra cost is different from zero if a is bigger than or equals 1. Furthermore, in case futures markets are positively biased minimum lower partial moment hedge ratios are smaller than the minimum variance hedge ratio (strictly smaller in case a is bigger than or equals 1). We used the Dutch FTI contract to hedge three Dutch stock market indexes. The in-sample analysis shows that (i) minimum semivariance and minimum variance hedge ratios are almost the same in size, (ii) minimum lower partial moment hedge ratios are smaller than minimum variance hedge ratios (only slightly smaller for a is bigger than or equals 1) and (iii) except for the lower partial moment with a=0.5, hedging downside risk using the minimum variance hedge ratio instead of the optimal hedge ratio is appropriate. For both strategies risk can be reduced in the same proportion whereas the extra cost of using the minimum variance hedge strategy is negligible. In contrast to (iii), out-of-sample results show that the extra cost of hedging lower partial moments with the minimum variance hedge strategy can be significant (statistically as well as in

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://zappa.ubvu.vu.nl/19950023.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics in its series Serie Research Memoranda with number 0023.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:vuarem:1995-23

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.feweb.vu.nl

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (R. Dam).

Related research
Keywords: downside risk; hedging; futures;

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Sarin, Rakesh K. & Weber, Martin, 1993. "Risk-value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 135-149, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Fishburn, Peter C, 1977. "Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 116-26, March.
  3. Mao, James C T, 1970. "Survey of Capital Budgeting: Theory and Practice," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 349-60, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Rolfo, Jacques, 1980. "Optimal Hedging under Price and Quantity Uncertainty: The Case of a Cocoa Producer," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(1), pages 100-116, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors can create their own profile with links to their works on the RePEc Author Service.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-9.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.