This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Gelderman, M. (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper gives a traditional review and meta-analysis of the literature on management support systems (MSS) success. Based on an extensive survey of published research in the problem domain factors, affecting MSS success as presented. Both a theoretical examination and an overview of empirical research of each factor are provided. Correlations above r = 0.3 are found for user maturity of IS department, flexibility, realism of user expectations quality of user documentation, formal development, user training, management support, and user expectations. Thus far, user involvement is the most widely investigated variable in empirical research. In this paper, the author makes an attempt to distinguish objective user involvement from user involvement as experienced by the user. Effect sizes for the latter variable appeared to be larger than findings for the first. Indicating that a 'feeling' of user involvement is more important than user involvement itself. A further analysis of the data shows effect sizes for laboratory studies to be lower, and more homogeneous than findings of field research. Furthermore, correlation between the contingency factors and user information satisfaction appeared to be higher than findings which used usage as the independent variable. The relation between the contingency factors and usage appears to be diminishing over time. This may be caused by the fact that MSS less often fall below the level at which managers cease to use the systems.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://zappa.ubvu.vu.nl/19950020.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics in its series Serie Research Memoranda with number 0020.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:vuarem:1995-20

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.feweb.vu.nl

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (R. Dam).

Related research
Keywords: management support systems; management support systems success; user satisfaction;

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "The relation between user information satisfaction, usage of management support systems and performance," Serie Research Memoranda 0043, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Data contributors to RePEc receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.