Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Nonparametric Estimation of the Costs of Non-Sequential Search

Contents:

Author Info

  • Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez

    ()
    (University of Groningen, and CESifo)

  • Zsolt Sandor

    ()
    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid)

  • Matthijs R. Wildenbeest

    ()
    (Kelley School of Business, Indiana University)

Abstract

We study a consumer non-sequential search oligopoly model with search cost heterogeneity. We first prove that an equilibrium in mixed strategies always exists. We then examine the nonparametric identification and estimation of the costs of search. We find that the sequence of points on the support of the search cost distribution that can be identified is convergent to zero as the number of firms increases. As a result, when the econometrician has price data from only one market, the search cost distribution cannot be identified accurately at quantiles other than the lowest. To solve this pitfall, we propose to consider a richer framework where the researcher has price data from many markets with the same underlying search cost distribution. We provide conditions under which pooling the data allows for the identification of the search cost distribution at all the points of its support. We estimate the search cost density function directly by a semi-nonparametric density estimator whose parameters are chosen to maximize the joint likelihood corresponding to all the markets. A Monte Carlo study shows the advantages of the new approach and an application using a data set of online prices for memory chips is presented.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://papers.tinbergen.nl/07102.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 07-102/1.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 04 Jan 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:uvatin:20070102

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tinbergen.nl

Related research

Keywords: consumer search; oligopoly; search costs; semi-nonparametric estimation;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Bester, H., 1993. "Price commitment in search markets," Discussion Paper, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research 1993-9, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  2. Acemoglu, Daron & Shimer, Robert, 2000. "Wage and Technology Dispersion," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(4), pages 585-607, October.
  3. Fershtman, C. & Fishman, A., 1991. "The "Perverse" Effects of Wage and Price Controls in Search Markets," Papers, Tel Aviv 11-91, Tel Aviv.
  4. Anderson, Simon P & Renault, Regis, 2000. "Consumer Information and Firm Pricing: Negative Externalities from Improved Information," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 41(3), pages 721-42, August.
  5. Maarten C. W. Janssen & José Luis Moraga-Gonz�lez, 2004. "Strategic Pricing, Consumer Search and the Number of Firms," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 1089-1118.
  6. Pieter A. Gautier & Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez & Ronald P. Wolthoff, 2007. "Structural Estimation of Search Intensity: Do Non-Employed Workers Search Enough?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, Tinbergen Institute 07-071/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  7. Morgan, Peter & Manning, Richard, 1985. "Optimal Search," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 923-44, July.
  8. Ali Hortaç Su & Chad Syverson, 2004. "Product Differentiation, Search Costs, And Competition in the Mutual Fund Industry: A Case Study of S&P 500 Index Funds," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 119(2), pages 403-456, May.
  9. Fenton, Victor M. & Gallant, A. Ronald, 1996. "Qualitative and asymptotic performance of SNP density estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 77-118, September.
  10. Berg, G.J. & Ridder, G., 1993. "An empirical equilibrium search model of the labour market," Serie Research Memoranda, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics 0039, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
  11. Matthew S. Lewis, 2011. "Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 409-449, 06.
  12. Han Hong & Matthew Shum, 2006. "Using price distributions to estimate search costs," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(2), pages 257-275, 06.
  13. Ken Burdett & Melvyn Coles, 2003. "Equilibrium Wage-Tenure Contracts," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1377-1404, 09.
  14. Gautier, Pieter A & Moraga-González, José-Luis & Wolthoff, Ronald, 2007. "Structural Estimation of Search Intensity: Do Non-Employed Workers Search Enough?," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 6440, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  15. Maarten C. W. Janssen & José Luis Moraga-González, 2004. "Strategic Pricing, Consumer Search and the Number of Firms," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 1089-1118, October.
  16. Asher Wolinsky, 2005. "Procurement via Sequential Search," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 113(4), pages 785-810, August.
  17. Moraga-González, José Luis & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2008. "Maximum likelihood estimation of search costs," European Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 820-848, July.
  18. repec:rje:randje:v:37:y:2006:2:p:257-275 is not listed on IDEAS
  19. Wolinsky, Asher, 1984. "Product Differentiation with Imperfect Information," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 53-61, January.
  20. Saul Lach, 2002. "Existence And Persistence Of Price Dispersion: An Empirical Analysis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 433-444, August.
  21. Mariano Tappata, 2009. "Rockets and feathers: Understanding asymmetric pricing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(4), pages 673-687.
  22. Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "An empirical model of search with vertically differentiated products," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(4), pages 729-757, December.
  23. Burdett, Kenneth & Judd, Kenneth L, 1983. "Equilibrium Price Dispersion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 955-69, July.
  24. George J. Stigler, 1961. "The Economics of Information," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69, pages 213.
  25. Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1987. "Competition and the Number of Firms in a Market: Are Duopolies More Competitive than Atomistic Markets?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(5), pages 1041-61, October.
  26. Stahl, Dale O, II, 1989. "Oligopolistic Pricing with Sequential Consumer Search," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 79(4), pages 700-712, September.
  27. Rob, Rafael, 1985. "Equilibrium Price Distributions," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 487-504, July.
  28. Varian, Hal R, 1980. "A Model of Sales," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 70(4), pages 651-59, September.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Michael T. Rauh, 2006. "Strategic Complementarities and Search Market Equilibrium," Working Papers, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy 2006-01, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dgr:uvatin:20070102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.