Second Best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size
AbstractRailway networks are characterised by variations in demand on different links. Optimal strategies therefore call for a differentiated treatment of fares, frequencies and vehicle sizes in various links. However, for several reasons, railway operators may apply uniform levels for these decision variables. In this paper we investigate the welfare losses implied by uniform setting of fares per km, frequencies or vehicle sizes. This is done within the context of a model with uniform cost structures, uniform price elasticities, uniform demand levels across the day, but with demand levels that vary across segments of the network. We demonstrate that the largest welfare loss results when frequencies are made uniform across links. Welfare losses due to making vehicle size and price per km uniform across links are smaller. We further find that when capacity, represented by frequency and vehicle size, is set at its optimal level at the various network segments, the contribution of price differentiation to social welfare is very limited. These results suggest that where differentiated prices are important to address issues like congestion and directional asymmetries in demand, differentiated supply in terms of vehicle size and in particular frequences are the preferred way of addressing demand variations on different segments in a network.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 07-007/3.
Date of creation: 15 Jan 2007
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tinbergen.nl
Railways; fares; second best; frequency; vehicle size; demand variations;
Other versions of this item:
- Piet Rietveld & Stefan van Woudenberg, 2007. "Second-best Decision Making of Railway Operators: How to Fix Fares, Frequency and Vehicle Size," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and University of Bath, vol. 41(3), pages 363-385, September.
- R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Erik T. Verhoef & Jan Rouwendal, 2004.
"Pricing, Capacity Choice, and Financing in Transportation Networks,"
Journal of Regional Science,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 405-435.
- Erik T. Verhoef & Jan Rouwendal, 2003. "Pricing, Capacity Choice and Financing in Transportation Networks," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-027/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- Erik Teodoor Verhoef & Jan Rouwendal, 2003. "Pricing, Capacity Choice and Financing in Transportation Networks," ERSA conference papers ersa03p41, European Regional Science Association.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.