Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Appreciative System of Urban ICT Policies


Author Info

  • Galit Cohen

    (J.F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University)

  • Peter Nijkamp

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)


Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have become important tools topromote and realize a variety of public goals and policies. The growing importance of ICT indaily life, business activities and govemance prompts the need to consider the role of ICTmore explicitIy in urban administrations and policies. What are the city maker's expectationsabout ICT? And how do they assess the future implications of ICT for their city? An analysisof these questions is needed to provide us with a better understanding of the extent to whichurban authorities are willing to invest in and to adopt ICT policy. This paper offers both aconceptual and an operational model that aims to map out the causes and implications of ICTperceptions and views of urban policy makers and/or administrative officials (denoted asurban front liners ). This is folIowed by the presentation of an operational path model, viz. alinear structural equations model (Lisrel). The model serves to describe and test therelationships between perceptions of the city, policy makers' beliefs about ICT and theassociated urban ICT policy. According to the model, respondents that perceive their city ashaving many urban functions (e.g., commercial centre, service centre, higher educationcentre) have more awareness to various ICT tools and are likely to consider a multiplicity ofICT measures as relevant to their city. Respondents that consider their city as having severebottlenecks (e.g., traffic congestion, housing shortage) are less likely to think of ICTmeasures and ICT -related goals as relevant to their city, nor that the municipality impactssignificantly on ICT in the city. Furthermore, respondents that perceive their city as sufferingfrom many socio-economic problems (unemployment, ageing population, industrial declineand so on), are likely to consider many ICT tools as relevant to their city, although they havea low awareness of the specific tools to be deployed. Finally, respondents who believe thatICT will affect significantIy (and positively) the city and its administration, tend to attach ahigh municipal influence on ICT, and consider many ICT initiatives as relevant to their city.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 03-022/3.

as in new window
Date of creation: 14 Mar 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:uvatin:20030022

Contact details of provider:
Web page:

Related research

Keywords: ICT; perceptions; Lisrel model; urban decision-makers;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Galit Cohen-Blankshtain & Eran Feitelson, 2011. "Light rail routing: do goals matter?," Transportation, Springer, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 343-361, March.


This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
  1. Geoffrey Vickers in Wikipedia English ne '')


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dgr:uvatin:20030022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.