Competing Transport Networks
AbstractIn a circular city model, I consider network design and pricing decisions for asingle fast transport connection that faces competition from a slower but betteraccessible transport mode. To access the fast transport network individuals haveto make complementary trips by slow mode. This fact has interesting implicationson the location decisions. I show that in the presence of competition the profit-maximizingand socially optimal decision would be to cluster the two stations. Bycontrast, in the absence of competition both a profit-maximizing firm and a socialplanner would locate the two stations on opposite sides of the circle.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 03-009/1.
Date of creation: 23 Jan 2003
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tinbergen.nl
Networks; Transportation; Competition; Market area; Circular city.;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
- D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure and Pricing - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2003-04-27 (All new papers)
- NEP-COM-2003-04-27 (Industrial Competition)
- NEP-GEO-2003-04-27 (Economic Geography)
- NEP-URE-2003-04-27 (Urban & Real Estate Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Niérat, Patrick, 1997. "Market area of rail-truck terminals: Pertinence of the spatial theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 109-127, March.
- Hendricks, Ken & Piccione, Michele & Tan, Guofu, 1995. "The Economics of Hubs: The Case of Monopoly," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 83-99, January.
- K.J.M. De Jaegher & B. Hoyer, 2010. "Strategic Network Disruption and Defense," Working Papers, Utrecht School of Economics 10-13, Utrecht School of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.