Measuring and Explaining the Limited Take-up of the Housing Benefit in the Netherlands
AbstractIt is well known that the take-up rate of the Dutch housing benefit and othermeans tested benefits is substantially below 100%. In order to measure non-take up oneusually has to simulate entitlement to the benefits. In this paper we take a closer look atthe quality of the simulation. We find evidence that simulation error is much moreimportant than has often been assumed in earlier studies. These studies use the simulationof entitlement in order to select the sample on which an explanatory model for the take-updecision is based. Simulation error may therefore lead to biases in the explanatoryanalysis. Our analysis suggests that a discrepancy between the income that is reported inour database and the income on which the decision to apply for the benefit is based is animportant source of simulation error.The data that were available for this study contain information about refused applicationsand therefore allow us to estimate a richer model than is conventionally used for theanalysis of take-up rates. In this model both the decision of a renting household to applyfor the benefit and that of the authorities to grant or refuse the subsidy are analyzed.Estimation results for this model differ from that of the first.A third model is explicitly based on the assumption that the decision-making processes arebased on an income level that may be different from that reported in the data. Forhouseholds that receive the housing benefit we can compute this alternative income. Thisthird model can be estimated if it is assumed that the same joint distribution of the twoincomes is relevant for households who did not apply for the benefit. Estimation resultsfor this model are again different from those of the other two. They suggest thatmeasurement error in rent, received benefits or housing composition are also more importantthat has been thought.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 02-033/3.
Date of creation: 22 Apr 2002
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tinbergen.nl
Housing benefit; means-tested benefits; non-take-up;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
- I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
- H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
- C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2002-05-07 (All new papers)
- NEP-PBE-2002-05-07 (Public Economics)
- NEP-PUB-2002-05-07 (Public Finance)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.