We explore the role of firms in insuring non-verifiable output. As a device that allows workers to commit to the delivery of their output, the firm arises endogenously as an alternative to the market if workers are sufficiently risk averse and the firm can base its incentive payments on good information. Competition, however, may allow the market and explicit contracts to crowd out implicit insurance, even though the latter yields higher welfare. Integrating the principal-agent and shirking models, we explain why different contracting modes coexist in quite homogeneous industries.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Andrei Shleifer & Lawrence H. Summers, 1988.
"Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers,"
NBER Chapters,
in: Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, pages 33-68
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]