A Multicriteria Decision Support Methodology for Evaluating Airport Expansion Plans
AbstractRational decision-making requires an assessment of advantages and disadvantages of choicepossibilities, including non-market effects (such as externalities). This also applies to strategicdecision-making in the transport sector (including aviation). In the past decades various decisionsupport and evaluation methods have been developed in which a market evaluation played aprominent role. The intrinsic limitations of these approaches were also increasingly recognised.Gradually, a variety of adjusted multidimensional methods has been developed over the pastyears to complement conventional Cost-Benefit Analysis. These methods aim to investigate andevaluate all relevant impacts of a choice possibility (e.g., project, plan, or programme) on the basisof a multitude of important policy criteria (so-called multicriteria methods). They have a particularrelevance in case of non-priced or qualitative effects.There is a clear need for a systematic and polyvalent multicriteria approach to many actualplanning issues, such as land use or transportation. This paper offers a new evaluation frameworkbased on a blend of three types of approaches, viz. Regime Analysis (an advanced pairwisecomparison method), the Saaty method (an analytical hierarchical procedure for preferencestatements) and the Flag Model (based on critical threshold value analysis). All these methods havebeen developed separately in the past; the paper makes an effort to offer a cohesive framework,which can be used for the evaluation of spatial-economic and environmental-economic policyissues.This new tool is tested by means of a case study on conflicting plans (and policy views) forairport expansion options in the Maastricht area in the Southern part of the Netherlands.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 01-005/3.
Date of creation: 17 Jan 2001
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tinbergen.nl
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2001-02-08 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Hinloopen, E. & Nijkamp, P. & Rietveld, P., 1982.
"Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning,"
Serie Research Memoranda
0023, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
- Hinloopen, Edwin & Nijkamp, Peter & Rietveld, Piet, 1983. "Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 77-102, February.
- Nijkamp, Peter & Vreeker, Ron, 2000. "Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 7-27, April.
- Anastasia STRATIGEA & Elias GRAMMATIKOGIANNIS, 2012. "A Multicriteria Decision Support Framework For Assessing Alternative Wind Park Locations: The Case Of Tanagra - Boiotia," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 105-120, June.
- Michael Dooms & Cathy Macharis, 2003. "A framework for sustainable port planning in inland ports: a multistakeholder approach," ERSA conference papers ersa03p201, European Regional Science Association.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.