Casper van Ewijk () (University of Amsterdam and CPB) Paul Tang (CPB)
Abstract
Progressive income taxes moderate wage demands by trade unions and thereby reduce unemployment, but also they reduce incentives to acquire skills and lower productivity of workers. The optimal response of the government to this dilemma is to choose a system of progressive taxes and to (partly) subsidise investment in human capital. A combination of generous education subsidies and steep tax rates is more likely to prevail the larger the power of trade unions to set wages, the better the ability of the government to steer private efforts to educate, and the higher the preference for equality between the employed and the unemployed. An empirical analysis for several OECD countries gives similar results. A policy mix of high education subsidies and relatively progressive income taxes is found in countries where union membership is significant and the replacement rate is high.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.