The test on the presence of full insurance that is commonly employed does not take into account that households also rely on buffer stocks to shield their consumption from income shocks. In this paper a test is developed that deals with this omission. It is shown that in the presence of partial insurance, the common test on the degree of informal insurance underestimates the degree of protection offered by informal arrangements. This finding has policy implications because if the degree of informal insurance is partial, but high nonetheless, targeting of transfers (in case of drought for instance) is of less importance while transitory movement out of poverty is limited. In the empirical part the newly developed test is employed for data on rural Zimbabwe. The presence of full insurance is rejected.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: