Root cancellation in Auto Regressive Moving Average (ARMA) models leads to local non-identification of parameters. When we use diffuse or normal priors on the parameters of the ARMA model, posteriors in Bayesian analyzes show an a posteriori favor for this local non-identification. We show that the prior and posterior of the parameters of an ARMA model are the (unique) conditional density of a prior and posterior of the parameters of an encompassing AR model. We can therefore specify priors and posteriors on the parameters of the encompassing AR model and use the prior and posterior that it implies on the parameters of the ARMA model, and vice versa. The posteriors of the ARMA parameters that result from standard priors on the parameters of an encompassing AR model do not lead to an a posteriori favor of root cancellation. We develop simulators to generate parameters from these priors and posteriors. As a byproduct, Bayes factors can be computed to compare (non-nested) parsimonious ARMA models. The procedures are applied to the (extended) Nelson-Plosser data. For approximately 50% of the series an ARMA model is favored above an AR model.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Did you know? You can include your works in the database easily by uploading them on the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) if you do not have access to an institutional RePEc archive.