Innovation, Industry Evoluation and Employment
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to introduce a series of articles on the linksbetween innovation, the evolution of industry and employment. These relationsprovide the building blocks of a new industrial policy. The articles areincluded in Innovation, Industry Evolution and Employment published by CambridgeUniversity Press in 1999. The continued rising unemployment coupled withmoderate growth in Europe has triggered a plea by policy makers for rethinkingthe policy approach that brought about European prosperity during the post-warera. The resulting policy debate has been cast in terms of an inevitabletradeoff between greater employment but at the sacrifice of lower wages on theone hand, versus the maintenance of wages and living standards but at the costof less employment on the other. In terms of this debate, the Anglo-Americansolution has been the former, while the continental Europeans have chosen thelatter. The purpose the thirteen articles of Innovation, Industry Evolution andEmployment is to suggest that this policy debate has been miscast. There is analternative. This alternative involves structural change, and in particularshifting economic activity out of traditional moderate-technology industries andinto new emerging knowledge-based industries. In other words, it involvesinnovation, industry evolution and their consequences for employmentdevelopment. To shed light on the links between innovation, industry evolutionand employment generation, the Tinbergen Institute of Erasmus UniversityRotterdam, the School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University, and EIMSmall- and Medium Sized Business Research and Consultancy in Zoetermeer, theNetherlands hosted a two day conference on the subject in Rotterdam andZoetermeer, 29-30 August, 1997. The thirteen articles included in Innovation,Industry Evolution and Employment reflect a carefully edited and revisedselection of the papers_new of this conference. What the articles have in common isthat they link some measure of economic performance to technology andinnovation, and they do it using a dynamic framework based on a longitudinaldatabase that tracks micro-observations over time.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 99-068/3.
Date of creation: 09 Sep 1999
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tinbergen.nl
innovation; industry evolution; employment;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- L0 - Industrial Organization - - General
- O0 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-1999-09-21 (All new papers)
- NEP-INO-1999-09-21 (Innovation)
- NEP-LAB-1999-09-21 (Labour Economics)
- NEP-PKE-1999-09-21 (Post Keynesian Economics)
- NEP-TID-1999-09-21 (Technology & Industrial Dynamics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michael C. Jensen, 1994.
"The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, And The Failure Of Internal Control Systems,"
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,
Morgan Stanley, vol. 6(4), pages 4-23.
- Jensen, Michael C, 1993. " The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(3), pages 831-80, July.
- Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 43-58.
- Steven J. Davis & John C. Haltiwanger & Scott Schuh, 1998. "Job Creation and Destruction," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262540932, December.
- Eli Berman & John Bound & Stephen Machin, 1997.
"Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence,"
Boston University - Institute for Economic Development
78, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development.
- Eli Berman & John Bound & Stephen Machin, 1998. "Implications Of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 113(4), pages 1245-1279, November.
- Eli Berman & John Bound & Stephen Machin, 1997. "Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence," NBER Working Papers 6166, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- E. Berman & J. Bound & S. Machin, 1997. "Implications of skill-biased technological change: international evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20314, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Berman, E. & Bound, J. & Machin, S., 1997. "Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence," Papers 25, Centre for Economic Performance & Institute of Economics.
- E Berman & J Bound & Stephen Machin, 1997. "Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence," CEP Discussion Papers dp0367, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Berman, Eli & Bound, John & Machin, Stephen, 1997. "Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence," Working Paper Series 486, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
- Richard Nelson, 1995. "Co-evolution of Industry Structure, Technology and Supporting Institutions, and the Making of Comparative Advantage," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 171-184.
- Samuel Kortum & Josh Lerner, 1997.
"Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?,"
NBER Working Papers
6204, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Kortum, Samuel & Lerner, Josh, 1998. "Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting?," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 247-304, June.
- Audretsch, David B & Stephan, Paula E, 1996. "Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 641-52, June.
- Nelson, Richard R., 1990. "Capitalism as an engine of progress," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 193-214, June.
- David B. Audretsch, 1995. "Innovation and Industry Evolution," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011468, December.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.