Decomposing Portfolio Value-at-Risk: A General Analysis
AbstractAn intensive and still growing body of research focuses on estimating a portfolio’s Value-at-Risk.Depending on both the degree of non-linearity of the instruments comprised in the portfolio and thewillingness to make restrictive assumptions on the underlying statistical distributions, a variety of analyticalmethods and simulation-based methods are available. Aside from the total portfolio’s VaR, there is agrowing need for information about (i) the marginal contribution of the individual portfolio components tothe diversified portfolio VaR, (ii) the proportion of the diversified portfolio VaR that can be attributed toeach of the individual components consituting the portfolio, and (iii) the incremental effect on VaR ofadding a new instrument to the existing portfolio. Expressions for these marginal, component and incremental VaR metricshave been derived by Garman [1996a, 1997a] under the assumption that returns are drawnfrom a multivariate normal distribution. For many portfolios, however, the assumption of normally distributedreturns is too stringent. Whenever these deviations from normality are expected to cause seriousdistortions in VaR calculations, one has to resort to either alternative distribution specifications orhistorical and Monte Carlo simulation methods. Although these approaches to overall VaR estimation have receivedsubstantial interest in the literature, there exist to the best of our knowledge no procedures for estimatingmarginal VaR, component VaR and incremental VaR in either a non-normal analytical setting or a MonteCarlo / historical simulation context.This paper tries to fill this gap by investigating these VaR concepts in a general distribution-freesetting. We derive a general expression for the marginal contribution of an instrument to the diversifiedportfolio VaR ? whether this instrument is already included in the portfolio or not. We show how in a mostgeneral way, the total portfolio VaR can be decomposed in partial VaRs that can be attributed to theindividual instruments comprised in the portfolio. These component VaRs have the appealing property thatthey aggregate linearly into the diversified portfolio VaR. We not only show how the standard results undernormality can be generalized to non-normal analytical VaR approaches but also present an explicitprocedure for estimating marginal VaRs in a simulation framework. Given the marginal VaR estimate,component VaR and incremental VaR readily follow. The proposed estimation approach pairs intuitiveappeal with computational efficiency. We evaluate various alternative estimation methods in an applicationexample and conclude that the proposed approach displays an astounding accuracy and a promisingoutperformance.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tinbergen Institute in its series Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers with number 99-034/2.
Date of creation: 20 May 1999
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tinbergen.nl
Value-at-Risk; marginal VaR; component VaR; incremental VaR; non-normality; non-linearity; estimation; simulation;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
- C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
- C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
- G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
- G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Kaplanski, Guy, 2004. "Traditional beta, downside risk beta and market risk premiums," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 636-653, December.
- Jean-David Fermanian & Olivier Scaillet, 2003.
"Sensitivity Analysis of Var and Expected Shortfall for Portfolios under Netting Agreements,"
2003-33, Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique.
- Fermanian, Jean-David & Scaillet, Olivier, 2005. "Sensitivity analysis of VaR and Expected Shortfall for portfolios under netting agreements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 927-958, April.
- Alexandre Kurth & Dirk Tasche, 2002. "Credit Risk Contributions to Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall," Papers cond-mat/0207750, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2002.
- Keel, Simon & Ardia, David, 2009. "Generalized Marginal Risk," MPRA Paper 17258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Dirk Tasche, 2002.
"Expected Shortfall and Beyond,"
cond-mat/0203558, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2002.
- Serge Darolles & Christian Gouriéroux & Emmanuelle Jay, 2012. "Robust Portfolio Allocation with Systematic Risk Contribution Restrictions," Working Papers 2012-35, Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique.
- Takashi Kato, 2011. "Theoretical Sensitivity Analysis for Quantitative Operational Risk Management," Papers 1104.0359, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2011.
- Teiletche, Jérôme & Roncalli, Thierry & Maillard, Sébastien, 2010. "The properties of equally-weighted risk contributions portfolios," Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine 123456789/4688, Paris Dauphine University.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Antoine Maartens (+31 626 - 160 892)).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.