Irreversible Investment under Uncertainty in Electricity Generation: A Clay-Clay-Vintage Portfolio Approach with an Application to Climate Change Policy in the UK
AbstractUK climate change policy has long been concerned with the transition to a more sustainable energy mix. The degree of competition in electricity markets rises as these markets become more and more liberalized. In order to survive in such an increasingly competitive setting, electricity producers have to handle as efficiently as possible the uncertainties associated with the volatility of fuel prices, but also uncertainties regarding the technological evolution of electricity production (including the development of renewable technologies). Technological uncertainty in combination with high capital costs are likely to deter investors from adopting renewable technologies on a larger scale than they are doing right now, even though they have to accept a higher degree of fuel price risk by doing so. By carefully composing a portfolio of technologies with different (co-)variances in the respective prices and rates of technical progress, risk-averse producers can effectively hedge the uncertainties mentioned above. In order to model this type of investment behaviour, we use an extended version of the van Zon and Fuss (2005) clay-clay-vintage-portfolio model that starts from the notion that investment in electricity production equipment is irreversible. However, a physical capital portfolio - in contrast to a portfolio of financial assets - can only be adjusted at the margin. This implies that it becomes extremely important to look ahead, and act on not just expectations themselves, but also their reliability. Using the extended model, we implement several features of present UK policy in order to illustrate the principles involved. We find that the reduction of risk goes together with an increase in total costs. We also find that for increasing values of risk-aversion, investors would be willing to adopt nuclear energy at earlier dates than otherwise would have been the case. In addition to this, we find that the embodiment of technical change, in combination with the expectation of a future switch towards another technology, may actually reduce current investment in that technology (while temporarily increasing current investment in competing technologies). The latter enables rational but risk-averse investors to maximise their productivity gain by waiting for ongoing embodied technical change to take place until the moment they plan to make the switch and then investing more heavily in the newest vintages associated with that technology at the time of the switch.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology in its series UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series with number 035.
Date of creation: 2006
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.merit.unu.edu
Investment; Energy Industry; Electric Utilities; Technology; Mathematical Modelling; Environmental Policy; United Kingdom;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- O16 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
- L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
- C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
- O13 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2006-10-14 (All new papers)
- NEP-ENE-2006-10-14 (Energy Economics)
- NEP-ENV-2006-10-14 (Environmental Economics)
- NEP-FIN-2006-10-14 (Finance)
- NEP-FMK-2006-10-14 (Financial Markets)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ad Notten).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.