Gehl Sampath, Padmashree () (United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies)
Abstract
The focus of this paper is to find an operative definition of traditional knowledge for purposes of drug research and development. Starting out with the international debate on Art. 8(j) of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 1993 and the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1995, it argues that the critical elements of any sui generis system should be rights' definitions that clearly identify the nature of information that is to be protected as traditional knowledge and the set of beneficiaries that are to exercise the right. Using the theory of cumulative innovation in biotechnology-based pharmaceutical research, the paper derives a justification for an intellectual property right for traditional medicinal knowledge that is based on its actual/ potential contribution to pharmaceutical research. Such a right, apart from clearly giving us the basis for demarcating communities/ groups of people who ought to exercise it, also helps achieve three incentive effects - the incentive to reveal information that is useful for the society at large, the incentive to keep such knowledge pools intact and lastly, the incentive to conserve biodiversity. These incentive effects provide us with a more robust basis to argue for a sui generis right over traditional medicinal knowledge
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies in its series Discussion Papers with number
4.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: