This paper argues that three major issues need to be addressed when examining the effects of the WTO's TRIPs agreement on capability building in developing economies. First, the agreement looks at seven instruments, which have both common as well as differing implications for capability building in developing economies. Second, four major theoretical arguments address the agreement, i.e. market-oriented, regulation, path-dependent knowledge dynamics and network synergies, and public and basic good characteristics of certain IPRs. Third, the capacity of economies to participate actively in the agreement depends on basic and high tech capabilities. The LIDEs have neither the basic infrastructure to ensure compliance nor the high tech infrastructure to support innovative activities. The Asian NIEs - especially the Republic of Korea - enjoy strong high tech and innovative capabilities. The second-tier NIEs and Latin American NIEs are generally endowed with strong basic infrastructure to strengthen compliance, but lack the high tech infrastructure to support innovative activities. Indeed, The LIDEs on average show higher levels of high tech infrastructure and resident patents than the second-tier NIEs. However, Indonesia and Philippines face serious shortcomings even in basic infrastructure
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies in its series Discussion Papers with number
01.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: