The aim of the paper is twofold. In the first place, to find an explanation for the mismatch phenomena which can be found on the labour market by emphasising the nontransparency of the labour market. In the second place, to derive an objective mismatch measure, which enables to investigate the quality of the match between occupations and types of education and to find that particular type of education which has a comparative advantage in the occupation concerned. The result is a theoretical model in which concave earnings-training profiles are derived. Initial wages indicate the quality of the match. Training is used to decrease the mismatch between acquired and required skills. By estimating earnings function by occupational level and occupational field the theoretical framework has been tested empirically. The hypothesis that the earnings-tenure profile is concave can be confirmed by the estimates. Furthermore, the estimates of the mismatch measure yield attractive results, especially concerning the quality of the match between occupational and educational levels. Finally, estimating a training function confirms the hypothesis that training efforts are positively related to the degree of mismatch. So, it may be concluded that the approach which has been developed in this paper yields a useful mismatch measure.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Maastricht : ROA, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market in its series Research Memoranda with number
003.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Howitt, Peter & McAfee, R Preston, 1987.
"Costly Search and Recruiting,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 28(1), pages 89-107, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)