Product lifecycles and skill-biased technical change
Abstract
The labour market position of low skilled workers has deteriorated dramatically over the 80s and early 90s. Awell-known manifestation of this deterioration is the rise in relative high-skilled wages observed in the UnitedStates. It is a well-documented fact that demand shifts underlie this deterioration and several studies indicate thattechnical change is a likely candidate to explain such relative demand shifts. It is, however, still not very wellunderstood why technological change would be biased persistently against low skilled workers when theirrelative labour costs are dropping. Modern economics considers technological change to be endogenous and theresult of rational decisions taken by economically constrained agents. This paper presents a model that providestwo possible answers to this puzzle. The bias can be caused by the deliberate development of skilled labourcomplementary technologies under certain conditions. If these conditions are met, the bias and the resultinglabour demand shift is a permanent one and so are the consequences for relative wages and employment levels.A slightly different specification with more realistic assumptions, however, can still explain the observed shift indemand. When I assume that the production of new products is inherently skill biased because uncertainty ishigh and flexibility required in the initial stages of the product life cycle, then the model can generate the shift inresponse to the introduction of a new general-purpose technology, for example the IT-revolution. Once newproducts mature and process innovations are made can low skilled workers be involved in the production of suchproducts. As such the model introduces some old ideas into a new debate.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by Maastricht : MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology in its series Research Memoranda with number 014.Length:
Date of creation: 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:umamer:2002014
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/web/UMPublications.htm
Related research
Keywords: economics of technology ;This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2002-06-13 (All new papers)
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dgr:umamer:2002014For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charles Bollen).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.