Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

On the definition of key sectors and the stability of net versus gross multipliers

Contents:

Author Info

  • Oosterhaven, Jan

    (Groningen University)

Abstract

Industries often promote their interests by arguing that they have a large impact on the rest of the economy. The same line of reasoning is used when so-called key sectors for economic development are searched for. In both cases, a one-sided view of the dependence of the rest of the economy on the sector at hand is used, and sectors with large forward and backward linkages are selected as being strategically important to the region or nation at hand. This onesided approach, however, disregards that the sectors selected may be heavily dependent on the rest of the economy, and may therefore in fact not be able to generate the growth impulses that their larger linkages are assumed to pass on to the rest of the economy. To avoid doublecounting impacts and to reckon with the two-sided nature of the dependency between a sector and the economy at large, the net multiplier concept is shown to provide an adequate solution. However, both the standard (gross) multiplier and the new net multiplier are essentially static concepts. When the search is for strategic sectors for future development, the question of the stability of both measures unavoidably arises. Besides the stability of the input-output coefficients, the stability of net multipliers is also based on the stability of its additional “exogenous demand/total endogenous output” ratios, which are unstable by nature. We argue that this property should not be seen as a vice, but as an additional virtue of the net multiplier concept, as it forces the analyst to explicitly consider this inherent instability instead of assuming the problem away as is usually done when gross multipliers are used.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/263677052
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management) in its series Research Report with number 04C01.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:rugsom:04c01

Contact details of provider:
Postal: PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen
Phone: +31 50 363 7185
Fax: +31 50 363 3720
Email:
Web page: http://som.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Jan Oosterhaven & Jan Van Der Linden, 1997. "European Technology, Trade and Income Changes for 1975-85: An Intercountry Input-Output Decomposition," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 393-412.
  2. Jan Oosterhaven & Dirk Stelder, 2002. "Net Multipliers Avoid Exaggerating Impacts: With A Bi-Regional Illustration for the Dutch Transportation Sector," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 533-543.
  3. Jan Oosterhaven & Gerard Eding & Dirk Stelder, 2001. "Clusters, Linkages and Interregional Spillovers: Methodology and Policy Implications for the Two Dutch Mainports and the Rural North," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(9), pages 809-822.
  4. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 1998. "Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 307-324.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Jan Oosterhaven, 2007. "The net multiplier is a new key sector indicator: reply to De Mesnard’s comment," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 273-283, June.
  2. Ferran Sancho, 2013. "Some conceptual difficulties regarding ‘net’ multipliers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 537-552, October.
  3. Louis Mesnard, 2007. "A critical comment on Oosterhaven–Stelder net multipliers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 249-271, June.
  4. Louis Mesnard, 2007. "Reply to Oosterhaven’s: the net multiplier is a new key sector indicator," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 285-296, June.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dgr:rugsom:04c01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joke Bulthuis).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.