Corporate risk management and hedging are important activities within financial as well as non-financial corporations. Under the assumptions of Modigliani and Miller [1958], corporate risk management is a redundant activity. However, the existence of market imperfections can explain the corporate use of derivatives. Hedging can increase firm value when 1) firms face a progressive tax rate, 2) there are expected costs from financial distress, and 3) hedging can reduce agency costs of debt. Furthermore, derivatives’ use can be explained by the risk attitude of managers. This paper provides a review of, and some critical notes on the theoretical and empirical literature on corporate risk management strategies. It will be stated that the empirical results for the theoretical hypotheses are mixed, even though corporate risk management can substantially increase firm value. The major determinant of derivatives’ use is firm size. The mixed results indicate that corporate risk managers, willingly or unwillingly, do not behave in an optimal way. Therefore, this study may motivate corporate risk managers to use derivative instruments in order to create shareholder value, since it shows the benefits of corporate risk management and the sources of these benefits.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management) in its series Research Report with number
01E06.