Micro Foundations for International Productivity Comparisons
AbstractThis paper describes the methodology and procedures of international comparisons of productivity levels for twelve manufacturing industries (producing food products, beer, soap and detergents, iron and steel, machine tools, various types of machinery, computers, audio and video equipment, industrial electronics, wired communication equipment, passenger cars and car components) between Germany, Japan and the United States. These estimates were carried out for a study on comparative productivity by the McKinsey Global Institute (1993). The starting point were estimates derived form the International Comparisons of Output and Productivity (ICOP) project at the University of Groningen (van Ark and Pilat, 1993). The original ICOP estimates on output, labour input and unit value ratios (the latter were used to convert output to a common currency) for the selected industries were adjusted where necessary to attain exact matching of activities on the basis of information derived form trade sources, companies and industry experts. Significant alterations were made to individual product PPPs to take account of differences in product mix and product quality between the countries. The extent and the direction of the corrections is different for the various industies. The biases are biggest for industies within the machinery and transport equipment branches. For manufacturing as a whole the original ICOP productivity estimates were only slightly downwardly biased by about 4-6 per cent. It is concluded that when using census data for comparisons at industry level, mix and quality problems need to be carefully considered. However, at a more aggregate level, for example for major branches in manufacturing, the original census-based UVRs are more robust.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen in its series GGDC Research Memorandum with number 199411.
Date of creation: 1994
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
- Van Ark, B. & Gersbach, H., 1994. "Micro Foundations for International Productivity Comparisons," Papers 572, Groningen State, Institute of Economic Research-.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Sean M. Dougherty & Robert Inklaar & Robert H. McGuckin & Bart van Ark, 2007.
"International Comparisons of R&D Expenditure: Does an R&D PPP Make a Difference?,"
NBER Working Papers
12829, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sean M. Dougherty & Robert Inklaar & Robert H. McGuckin & Bart van Ark, 2007. "International Comparisons of R&D Expenditure: Does an R&D PPP Make a Difference?," NBER Chapters, in: Hard-to-Measure Goods and Services: Essays in Honor of Zvi Griliches, pages 291-322 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sean M. Dougherty & Robert Inklaar & Robert H. McGuckin & Bart van Ark, 2003. "International Comparisons of R&D Expenditure: Does an R&D PPP make a difference?," Economics Program Working Papers 03-03, The Conference Board, Economics Program, revised Jun 2006.
- Laurence Nayman & Deniz Ünal-Kesenci, 2001. "The French-German Productivity Comparison Revisited : Ten Years after the German Unification," Working Papers 2001-14, CEPII research center.
- Elias Kourliouros & George Korres & Emmanuel Marmaras & George Tsobanoglou, 2006. "Economic Geography and Regional Growth: An Empirical Evidence From Greece," ERSA conference papers ersa06p30, European Regional Science Association.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joke Bulthuis).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.