Innovatie en Mededinging: Op Zoek naar de Bron van Welvaart en Vooruitgang
AbstractCompetition and innovation both stimulate the development and growth of the economy. The mutual effect on prosperity and welfare growth have been researched and published extensively. The effect between innovation and competition is often overlooked and it is this very nexus that can provide us with the key to answering the following questions about welfare growth: What are the optimal levels of innovation and competition to stimulate growth? Is there an inverse U-curve present, and if so in which industries and what are the corresponding optimal levels of competition and innovation in those sectors? The Roman Empire was able to dictate and control the world for many centuries because they understood the relationship between innovation, gaining a competitive edge and success. The innovations ranging from battlefield ‘eagles’ to the first armoured unit to the invention of the scutum all helped to maintain an advantage that allowed them separate themselves from the masses. Translating this to todays’ world we can see that the essence of competition and innovation have not changed, still both are needed to optimize a welfare enhancing environment in today’s business world. Schumpeter’s early work (mark I&II) both examined the relationship between innovation and competition. These findings were used by Aghion to further investigate the relationship between innovation and competition to see whether an inverse U-curve is indeed apparent in the UK. In this paper Brouwer outlines the methodological weaknesses in the works presented by Aghion et all and proposes new indicators to more accurately estimate an econometric model, which will enhance the validity and give policy makers a more profound judgement to base future policies on.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center in its series Discussion Paper with number 2007-021.
Date of creation: 2007
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tilburguniversity.nl/tilec/
Innovation; competition; innovation & competition; inverse U-curve; chumpeter; Brouwer;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Mohnen, Pierre & Palm, Franz & Schim van der Loeff, Sybrand & Tiwari, Amaresh, 2008.
"Financial Constraints and Other Obstacles: Are they a Threat to Innovation Activity?,"
MERIT Working Papers
006, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
- P. Mohnen & F. Palm & S. Loeff & A. Tiwari, 2008. "Financial Constraints and Other Obstacles: are they a Threat to Innovation Activity?," De Economist, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 201-214, June.
- Mohnen, Pierre & Palm, Franz & Schim van der Loeff, Sybrand & Tiwari, Amaresh, 2008. "Financial Constraints and Other Obstacles: Are they a Threat to Innovation Activity?," MERIT Working Papers 006, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
- Sybrand Schim van der Loeff & Pierre Mohnen & Franz Palm & Amaresh K. Tiwari, 2008. "Financial Constraints and other Obstacles: Are they a Threat to Innovation Activity?," CESifo Working Paper Series 2204, CESifo Group Munich.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Broekman) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Richard Broekman to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.