The classic Kriging variance formula is widely used in geostatistics and in the design and analysis of computer experiments. This paper proves that this formula is wrong. Furthermore, it shows that the formula underestimates the Kriging variance in expectation. The paper develops parametric bootstrapping to estimate the Kriging variance. The new method is tested on several arti/cial examples and a real-life case study. These results demonstrate that the classic formula underestimates the true Kriging variance.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number
46.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)