We reexamine empirical evidence on strategic risk-taking behavior by mutual fund managers. Several studies suggest that fund performance in the first semester of a year influences risk-taking in the second semester. However, we show that previous empirical studies implicitly assume that idiosyncratic fund returns (in a factor model) are uncorrelated across funds. We present generalized methodologies (based on both contingency tables and regression analysis) that accommodate the case of a general error structure. We show that the correlation between idiosyncratic fund returns is essential to the analysis and, when it is taken into account, the empirical evidence of strategic risk taking by fund managers disappears.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number
9.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Corry Stuyts).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: