Assortment Variety: Attribute versus Product-Based
AbstractRetailers need to decide on the content and structure of their product assortments, and thereby on the degree of variety that they offer to their customers.This paper compares measures of assortment variety and relates them to underlying variety components.We conceptualize assortment variety from a product and an attribute perspective, compare extant measures of assortment variety, and examine the appropriateness of these measures in capturing assortment variety as perceived by consumers.Recently, Hoch, Bradlow and Wansink (1999) introduced a general model of assortment variety based on product dissimilarities.The current study takes an alternative approach and proposes variety measures based on attributes, specifically the dispersion across attribute levels and the association between the attributes of the products in an assortment.Attribute dispersion refers to the diversity of attribute levels in an assortment (e.g. the relative proportion of red, green, blue products), while association between attributes refers to systematic links between attributes (e.g. all red products are large).We show that product-based and attribute-based approaches to assortment variety lead to substantially different measures with different effects on consumers' perceptions of variety.A first, synthetic, data set, shows that measures of attribute dispersion, attribute association and assortment size reflect specific components of assortment variety.The product-based measure proposed by Hoch et al. is sensitive to the size of the assortment, while the attribute-based measures respond only to specific changes in the content of an assortment.A second, consumer, data set shows that the attribute-based approach accounts best for consumers' perceptions of variety, and offers diagnostic power to retailers by explicating variety components.Attribute-based measures of variety significantly add to the prediction of consumers' perceptions of variety, over and above the product-based variety measures, while the reverse is not the case.In the final section we discuss how attribute-based measures can be used in assortment management, e.g. when assortments of different size are compared, when the impact of adding or dropping products on assortment variety is to be determined, and when diagnostic information about assortment variety is important.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number 2000-58.
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://center.uvt.nl
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
- C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
- C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jacquemin, Alexis P & Berry, Charles H, 1979. "Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 359-69, June.
- Menon, Satya & Kahn, Barbara E, 1995. " The Impact of Context on Variety Seeking in Product Choices," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(3), pages 285-95, December.
- Bettman, James R & Luce, Mary Frances & Payne, John W, 1998. " Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(3), pages 187-217, December.
- van Trijp, Hans C M & Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M, 1990. "An Investigation into the Validity of Measures for Variation in Consumption Used in Economics and Marketing," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 17(1), pages 19-41.
- Mitchell, Deborah J & Kahn, Barbara E & Knasko, Susan C, 1995. " There's Something in the Air: Effects of Congruent or Incongruent Ambient Odor on Consumer Decision Making," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 229-38, September.
- Stone, Dan N. & Schkade, David A., 1991. "Numeric and linguistic information representation in multiattribute choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 42-59, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Corry Stuyts).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.