Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Two-Step Sequential Sampling


Author Info

  • Moors, J.J.A.
  • Strijbosch, L.W.G.

    (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research)


Deciding upon the optimal sample size in advance is a difficult problem in general. Often, the investigator regrets not having drawn a larger sample; in many cases additional observations are done. This implies that the actual sample size is no longer deterministic; hence, even if all sample elements are drawn at random, the final sample is not a simple random sample. Although this fact is widely recognized, its consequences are often grossly underrated in our view. Too often, these consequences are ignored: the usual statistical procedures are still applied. This paper shows in detail the dangers of applying standard techniques to extended samples. To allow theoretical derivations only some elementary situations are considered. More precisely, the following features hold throughout the paper: - the population variable of interest is normally distributed; - estimation concerns population mean and variance; - all sample elements are drawn at random, with replacement; - only standard estimators, like sample mean and sample variance, will be considered. Nevertheless, the results are rather disturbing: standard estimators have sizable biases, their variances are (much) larger than usual, and standard confidence intervals do not have the prescribed confidence level any more. Crucial is of course the criterion used to decide whether or not to extend the original sample. Four criteria are applied. In the first three cases, an independent event, the observed sample mean and the observed sample variance, respectively, determine whether or not to double the original sample size. The fourth criterion compares the variances observed in two independent samples; the sample with the highest variance is extended. Only in this fourth case the size of the extension is a random variable. Note that a given criterion is used only once: after the original observation s the final sample size is determined; hence the title of our paper.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Richard Broekman)
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number 2000-39.

as in new window
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:kubcen:200039

Contact details of provider:
Web page:

Related research

Keywords: sampling; bias;

Find related papers by JEL classification:


References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & Groenendaal, W.J.H. van, 1992. "Two-stage versus sequential sample-size determination in regression analysis of simulation experiments," Research Memorandum 572, Tilburg University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)



This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dgr:kubcen:200039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Broekman).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.