Double Checking for Two Error Types
AbstractAuditing a large population of recorded values is usually done by means of sampling.Based on the number of incorrect records that is detected in the sample, a point estimate and a confidence limit for the population fraction of incorrect values can be determined.In general it is (implicitly) assumed that the auditor does not make mistakes while judging the correctness of the values. However, in practice this assumption does not necessarily hold: auditors are human and can make errors.To take this possibility into account, a subsample of the audited records is checked once more by a second auditor who is assumed never to make mistakes.The information obtained from these two samples should be combined to derive an estimate for the error rate in the population.The starting point for this type of double checking was Moors et al.(2000).Only one possible error type was considered: auditors could only miss (fail to detect) existing errors.For the case of random sampling, the maximum likelihood estimator as well as an upper confidence limit for the error rate were derived.The present paper gives extensions in two directions.Firstly, a second error type is introduced: the auditor may consider a correct value as an error.Again, the sample information of both auditor and infallible expert is combined to give point and interval estimates for the fraction of errors in the population.Secondly, a Bayesian analysis is presented for both the model with one error type and the extended model.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number 2000-120.
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://center.uvt.nl
auditing; Bayesian statistics; quality control; sampling; error analysis;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
- C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
- C42 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Survey Methods
- C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
- M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Accounting - - - Accounting
You can help add them by filling out this form.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Broekman).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.