We analyze answers to household survey questions on whether the respondents' household income has changed in the past twelve months, and on whether the respondents expect their household income to change in the next twelve months. Both questions are answered on a discrete five points scale. The data are an unbalanced panel of eleven consecutive annual waves. Using cross-tabulations of expected and realized changes, we first test the "best-case" hypothesis. This hypothesis implies, under two different nonparametric assumptions on how respondents form their predictions, that respondents have rational expectations, that there are no common unexpected shocks, and that reported expectations are best predictions of future outcomes. We find that the best case hypothesis is rejected: for all years, too many respondents who predict an income fall, ex post report that their household income has not changed. We then construct a bivariate ordered probit random effects panel data model, in which we explain both expectations and realizations from background variables such as age, education level, and labour market status, and from the one year lagged expectation and realization. We show that the hypothesis of rational expectations implies certain restrictions on the parameters in the two equations of this model. The model is estimated by simulated maximum likelihood using the Geweke-Hajivassilou-Keane (GHK) method. The hypothesis of rational expectations is rejected. The hypotheses that expectations are adaptive or naive can be tested in a similar way, and are also rejected.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number
105.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Corry Stuyts).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)