This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Predatory pricing : strategic theory and legal policy

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Bolton, P.
Brodley, J.F.
Riordan, M.H. (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=3948
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research in its series Discussion Paper with number 82.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:dgr:kubcen:199982

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://center.uvt.nl

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Corry Stuyts).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Luis Granero, 2005. "Upward and Downward Limit Pricing: The Role of Post-Entry Competition," Topics in Theoretical Economics, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1146-1146. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Danny Ben-Shahar & Assaf Jacob, 2004. "Selective Enforcement of Copyright as an Optimal Monopolistic Behavior," Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1189-1189. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Andrew Eckert, 2002. "Predatory Pricing and the Speed of Antitrust Enforcement," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 375-383, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Sebastien Lecou & Bernard Roy, 2008. "Sharing costs between a Service of General Economic Interest and Competitive Activities: The Example of the Postal Retail Network," Review of Network Economics, Concept Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 309-324, June. [Downloadable!]
  5. Aaron S. Edlin & Joseph Farrell, 2004. "The American Airlines Case: A Chance to Clarify Predation Policy," Law and Economics 0401003, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Boone, Jan, 2003. "Optimal Competition: A Benchmark for Competition Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 3766, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  7. John Vickers, 2007. "Some Economics of Abuse of Dominance," Economics Series Working Papers 376, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  8. Thomas Hazlett & George Ford, 2001. "The Fallacy of Regulatory Symmetry: An Economic Analysis of the 'Level Playing Field' in Cable TV Franchising Statutes," Business and Politics, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 3(1), pages 21-46. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Michael Katz, 2002. "Recent Antitrust Enforcement Actions by the U.S. Department of Justice: A Selective Survey of Economic Issues," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 373-397, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Joseph Farrell and Michael L. Katz., 2001. "Competition or Predation? Schumpeterian Rivalry in Network Markets," Economics Working Papers E01-306, University of California at Berkeley. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Rainer Nitsche, 2002. "On the Effectiveness of Anit-Predation Rules," CIG Working Papers FS IV 02-12, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG). [Downloadable!]
  12. Christopher Thomas & Brad Kamp, 2007. "Buying Market Share: Agency Problem or Predatory Pricing?," Review of Law & Economics, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Christian Dahl Winther, 2007. "Optimal research effort and product differentiation in network industries," Economics Working Papers 2007-19, School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus. [Downloadable!]
  14. Bouckaert, Jan & Verboven, Frank, 2003. "Price Squeezes in a Regulatory Environment," CEPR Discussion Papers 3824, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  15. Behringer, Stefan, 2007. "Spacial Predation in the UK Newspaper Industry," MPRA Paper 3242, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Apr 2007. [Downloadable!]
  16. Dalida Kadyrzhanova, 2005. "Predatory Governance," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 421, Society for Computational Economics. [Downloadable!]
  17. Oilver Budzinski & Katharina Wacker, 2007. "The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200704, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was launched in September 1997.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-29.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.